11.02.2010

Emerging Trends Driving the 2010 China Auto Industry

November 3, 2010

by Bill Russo and Jeffrey Zhao

2009 was a year of tremendous historical significance to the China auto industry. Triggered by the global financial crisis, the global automotive industry witnessed a year of unprecedented restructuring, as many industry icons struggled for their survival. After peaking in 2007 at 70 million units, the global automotive markets experienced a contraction of nearly 10% over the next 2 years. The mature “triad” markets of North America, Western Europe, and Japan have led this decline.

China is the noteworthy exception. In 2009, China easily surpassed the US in total car sales to become the world’s largest automotive market. China’s vehicle sales of 13.64 million units were more than 2 million units ahead of the second largest market, the United States. The astonishing growth in car demand was a direct result of many factors that continue to fuel China’s economy. This includes aggressive tax cuts as well as significant investment made in the development of the infrastructure to support transportation. The China government views the automotive industry as a “pillar” of its economy since it brings technology, jobs and investment to the economy. As such, several agencies of the China government play an active role in sponsoring initiatives to further stimulate automotive development and growth.

Driven by the onset of the global financial crisis, the Automotive Industry Stimulus Plan published in early 2009 took specific measures designed to spark the growth of consumer demand. Measures including the reduction of sales tax for cars below 1.6L engine displacement, along with subsidies for new minibus or light truck sales for rural residents have accelerated the auto market expansion particularly in China’s lower-tier cities, helping to boost the performance of the manufacturers of these smaller vehicles.

While aggressive tax cuts and subsidies have been behind much of the demand growth in 2009, the question remained regarding how stable and sustainable this growth would be in 2010. While very few expected a repeat of the 41% growth experienced last year, the question regarding sustainability of demand growth was often raised at the beginning of 2010. However, demand has continued to be quite strong through the first nine months of 2010. In fact, auto sales in China have risen nearly 36% from a year earlier to 13.14 million units according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). Sales for the full year are easily expected to surpass 17 million units.

However, automotive companies in China are today finding themselves confronted with a different set of challenges from what they were just a few years ago. From the demand side, Chinese consumers are becoming more selective and are making more diverse and personal choices: making their own individual choices, not just for their family. Meanwhile, demand growth is increasingly driven by lower-tier (Tier 3 and below) cities more than large and mega cities. The Chinese government has also released more restrictive regulatory requirements for safety, environmental care and foreign investment. From the supply side, almost every international player has recognized China as their largest source of future profit and has thereby committed significant investment. Additionally, Chinese local brands have never been so aggressive in fighting for market share than today. All these challenges are pushing global as well as local vehicle manufacturers to alter their thinking and adopt new strategies to play the game.

Based on the developments of this year, we can see several emerging trends that are driving the near-term development of the China automotive industry:

  • Sustainable demand growth fueled by urban economic development
  • Shifting preferences for increasingly savvy consumers
  • Hyper-competition across the automotive market segments
  • Adaptive brand innovation to extend product reach and grow share
  • Increasing focus on the automotive aftermarket
  • Accelerated drive to globalization


Sustainable demand growth fueled by urban economic development

As previously noted, year-to-date Chinese auto sales are 36% higher than the same period of 2009, with an annualized yearly sales forecast to be over 17 million vehicles. While this is quite a strong performance, it was apparent that starting in April annualized growth began to decelerate, which indicated a transition from the explosive growth of 2009 to a more stable and sustainable pattern in 2010. Such a change is mainly attributable to adjustments made in the Chinese economy to tighten credit and government investment to tackle inflation. In addition, tax subsidies and sales incentives offered by government during 2009 financial crisis were reduced with a resulting impact on more price sensitive car buyers.


Despite that, China is still the world largest and fastest growing market. The double-digit growth momentum will be maintained for at least the next three years. A key reason for continued growth is the rapid development of China’s lower-tier cities. While China’s explosive automotive growth has been most evident in the Tier 1 cities, it is important to note that the trends of urbanization and growth of per-capita GDP will continue into the foreseeable future. As these factors are directly linked to the growth in demand for automobiles, one can expect a continuation of growth next year and thereafter. Urban wealth accumulation is undoubtedly fueling the growth in automotive sales. The fact that 85% of all vehicles are sold to urban residents is a clear sign of the relationship.

There is no mistaking the trend of permanent migration of rural population to existing urban areas. Looking forward, it is expected that nearly two-thirds of China’s population will be in urban areas by 2020. This represents a whopping rise in urban population of nearly 200 million people in just over 10 years. Essentially, China creates the population-equivalent of a city of between 1.5 – 2 million people each month! It is no wonder why China’s cities are continually under construction.


Shifting preferences for increasingly savvy consumers

As income levels continue to rise, demand may begin to shift towards vehicles and segments offering more appealing content and features, which may create opportunities for manufacturers to improve their product mix. Early-movers in the China market such as Volkswagen and General Motors have enjoyed significant profit margins by occupying mid-size sedan, full-size sedan and MPV segments without a great deal of competition. In such a market environment, strong profits could be made on products such as the VW Santana and the Buick GL8 minivan – older technologies that dominated their segments with good margins. However, today’s China market no longer offers such an easy road to profitability. Virtually every major vehicle manufacturer is now present in the China market. A recent J.D. Power & Associates study has reported that many of the cars sold in 2009 were in low-end segments that are eligible for tax incentives and that many of these cars earn the manufacturers as little as $100 each.

Coming into 2010, Chinese consumers are increasingly seeking more innovative design for their first cars. Emerging buyers, particularly females and those under 30 are aspiring to a more recreational lifestyle and seeking more individualistic choices. For these consumers, coupe and crossover concept vehicles of stylish design are a better fit to their values. To meet the emerging Chinese preference for fashion and sportiness, both multi-national corporations (MNCs) and Chinese vehicle makers are shifting focus of their new launches to more dynamic and stylish products.

As shown in the Beijing International Motor Show in April 2010, many examples of such coupe, CUV and crossover vehicles were shown. These included vehicles such as Audi’s A3 and A5 Sportback, Honda’s Crosstour, Hyundai’s new SUV ix35, Infiniti IX35, BYD's S6, Mitsubishi's RVR, and Chang’An H30 Cross. These new styles have generated a good traffic to the booth and the dealer showroom. The sales figures of such crossover concept vehicles have this year risen to 1.84million so far, an increase of over 29%.

The future outlook is that local brands and international brands will install more capacity in China, placing even more pressure on pricing in the battle to gain market share. Weak brands and older models will become the first casualties as market and competitive forces squeeze them out. The competitive battle can only be won with strong brands and contemporary models that can be delivered profitably to savvy Chinese consumers with choices that demand a competitive price.


Hyper-competition across the automotive market segments

China’s vehicle market has nearly tripled in size from 4.56 million units (in 2003) to 13.64 million units (in 2009). Global Insight has forecasted that the Asian markets represent the largest growth potential in the global auto industry - with a combined 4.7% compound annual growth rate over the next 10 years (compared with 2.9% in NAFTA). Within Asia, 54% of that growth is expected to come from China. With the promise of tremendous growth, many international firms as well as Chinese firms are encouraged to allocate resources to seize the opportunities presented by the Chinese market.

While many Vehicle Manufacturers have enjoyed strong sales growth, what may not be understood or appreciated among those who are observing the growth in sales is that this is a market where quantity of sales should not be confused with quality of sales. The China market is now experiencing what many companies doing business in globally have come to understand for many years: hyper-competition.

In 2010 we have seen even more intense competition among the foreign and domestic brand vehicle manufacturers as they attempt to capture growth opportunities in China. As this is happening, the local manufacturers will strive to upgrade their brands and product portfolios to meet the more upscale image aspirations of Chinese consumers.

For the early stages of the development of the China market, the multi-national brands and Chinese brands were for the most part not competing directly with each other. Foreign brands enjoyed a tremendously high share of the passenger vehicle market, with overall share of more than 70% as recently as last year. Until recently, China's automotive market was largely driven by the more affluent Chinese consumers who tended to shop for foreign branded products. However, first-time consumers entering the market have largely driven the recent sales jump. The Chinese local brand manufacturers have typically focused on these first-time buyers.

This is changing quickly. Attracted by the tremendous growth of these segments, many multi-national brands are expanding their product portfolio into smaller segments. Examples include the Ford Focus Hatchback, Chevrolet Cruze, PSA 207 Hatchback, Hyundai i30, VW Polo Sport, Toyota Yaris, smart Fortwo, and Kia Soul.

Attracted by the desire to raise their brand image, and achieve higher margins, the Chinese carmakers are also expanding their product portfolio – into larger segments. Examples include Chery’s Rely V5, Riich G6, Dongfeng’s S30, BYD’s S8 and M6, Geely’s Dihao and Yinglun and the Brilliance Zunchi.

Since China has become the most attractive area to invest for growth, it seems that Chinese consumers will be enjoying even more choices and even more attractive pricing as a result of hyper-competition. Structurally, vehicle manufacturers must adapt to compete profitably in this hyper-competitive market.


Adaptive brand innovation to extend product reach and grow share

An interesting fact is that a great majority of international firms have effectively defended their market positions against local brands. Compared with five years ago, international brands have lost about 5% share of the rapidly expanding passenger car market. Through July, they are still comfortably leading the Chinese market with a total share of 70%. Year-to-date sales growth for most multi-national corporations (MNCs) is up 20% from last year.

While some of this success is a result of an expanded product portfolio, it appears that MNCs have maintained their sales success without a dramatic increase in new product launches. One of the most innovative approaches we have discovered is what we would call “adaptive brand innovation”. This approach involves delivering market-specific adaptations and modifications, extending the range of segment participation to new price-points and product categories, and creation of new brands and products. Many of these approaches are often taken together with local Chinese partners.

As early as 2005, MNCs began with different levels of modification ranging from exterior facelifts, powertrain upgrades, restyling of vehicles, and wheelbase extensions. These efforts were taken to meet the unique and diversified taste of Chinese consumers, instead of simply localizing the global vehicle “as-is”. Typical examples are the extended wheelbase Audi A4 and A6, BMW 5 and MB E-class in the luxury segment, as well as the upcoming long wheelbase VW Magotan for chauffer driven buyers. Adaptation of smaller engines to new vehicles is also a way to increase interest in the product, such as new generation VW 1.4TSI Polo GTI and Golf 6 that dropped the 1.6L and 1.8T engines used by last generation platform.

Small and compact car segments with engine displacement of 1.6 liters and below are traditionally dominated by low-priced Chinese local brands. However, represented by Hyundai, Toyota and GM, MNCs are increasingly down-pricing their volume models to close the price gap with Chinese brands. Such competitively priced products appeal to Chinese consumers because of their brand equity. These pricing strategies have resulted in a number of best sellers in small and compact segments, such as Hyundai Elantra, Buick Excelle, Chevrolet Spark, and others.

Many MNCs are also creating new brands and products together with their Chinese partners. While initially in response to government regulations on new joint ventures, MNCs are increasingly pursuing this as a means for capturing the volume opportunities in the lower priced segments. This approach can include co-developing a new product under an international brand, or creating a new mid-market brand within the context of a JV, or supporting the Chinese partner’s local brand development. Several international OEMs are already moving forward in those directions, such as Lavida developed by SAIC and VW, a new JV brand created by Honda and GAIC, a new generation small car platform developed by SAIC and GM.

Driven by the same incentive as above, MNCs are also offering their technical assistance to supply high performance powertrains to support the extension of the local partner’s products into higher priced segments. For instance, the recent co-development agreement between SAIC and GM for a next-generation fuel efficient global engine platform, Beiqi Foton and Daimler truck’s JV agreement which provides Daimler’s diesel engine’s local production and supply to the local partner’s heavy duty trucks.


Increasing focus on the automotive aftermarket

Along the value chain of global automotive industry, profit is gradually shifting from the vehicle manufacturing to aftermarket service. It is generally understood that aftermarket service and parts contributes more than half of the profits to the global automotive industry. In the United States, more than 70% of auto firms’ earnings have come from their service and parts business, in contrast to only 40% in China.

Entering 2010, Chinese vehicle makers and their international partners obviously recognized huge opportunities from the aftermarket opportunity and accelerated their pace of resource commitment. For network development, vehicle makers are shifting the focus from building brand new 4S dealerships to encouraging current dealers to set up 1S or 2S sub-dealers, particularly in suburban areas, as well as accessible places for rural consumers. For example, among 125 dealers of Mercedes Benz nationwide, there are 42 satellite dealers including 37 sales only dealers and 5 service workshops.

Establishment of sub-dealerships not only provides greater access to potential buyers, but also helps to support service delivery to remote car owners. For service delivery, vehicle makers are dedicated to implementing Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems and brand experience management stantards to each dealer showroom. Customer retention and lifetime value creation become a focus through the dealer management and performance assessment system.

For service innovation, the vehicle makers are also look beyond traditional service and parts, and extend to derivative business, such as leasing & financing, used car sales, rebuilding & decoration, telematics, and other business. Such an expanded product and service portfolio creates incremental value to car owners, and also maximizes the profitability of OEMs. Shanghai GM and Toyota China are among those first movers to launch their used car business and introduced their own telematics brands (On-star and G-book) to China.


Accelerated drive to globalization

The global financial crisis temporarily disrupted growth in the business for exporting vehicles made in China. However, domestic vehicle manufacturers are once again focusing here and the business has picked up rapidly since early 2010, experiencing a 62.5% growth in the first nine months of 2010. Total export is as high as 405,200 units with even split of passenger and commercial vehicles.

Such a strong rebound is largely fueled by a recovery of market demand in places such as Algeria, Vietnam, Syria, Russia, Egypt, Bangladesh, Iran, Chile, and Brazil. Moreover, improved product quality and a focused business strategy of Chinese local brands has contributed to Chinese export growth. One example is Great Wall Motor Company’s success in securing approval for sales in the European Union, which has enabled them to assemble and ship their 4 small cars to all European countries. It also has greatly enhanced the quality image and market acceptance of Chinese vehicles in other markets.

In view of growing entry barrier of most export markets, Chinese local brands are shifting their market entry strategy from complete vehicle shipment to building a KD plant to assemble locally. Great Wall and Chery have aggressively invested in local facilities in the Middle East, South America and Africa - either solely or with local partners. Meanwhile, other Chinese firms have chosen to work with their international partners to jointly develop locally-adapted product platforms for those fast-growing markets. Recent cooperation between SAIC-Wuling and GM to set up a 50:50 JV to expand into India is a starting point of shifting Chinese small car and engine technology to other markets. With such aggressive and innovative efforts, we expect to see China emerge as a platform for globalization in the coming years.

Summary

These trends observable in the China auto industry in 2010 are reshaping the brands, products and global footprint of those who hope to prosper in the global automotive industry. This is pushing multi-national as well as local Chinese vehicle manufacturers to alter their thinking and adopt new strategies to play the game.

We can now clearly see that China is playing a leading role in the development of the 21st century global auto industry.

10.30.2010

Leveraging China & India for Global Competitiveness: Theme 1

October 31, 2010

by Glenn Hodges and Bill Russo

In our last posting, we introduced four clear China-India themes which provide insight into the nature of the challenges and opportunities for creating value in and through these markets. Each of these themes stands on its own to provide insight for companies looking to maximize value from China and India. The real value of these themes, however, is that collectively they demarcate a range of options for maximizing value within China and India as well as globally.

Background On The Automotive Sector In China & India

As explained in our prior posting, we chose to focus on the automotive sector. Rapidly moving from a low cost source of supply for parts and components, China has become a global automotive powerhouse with increasing activity along the entire value chain. As a car market, China is now unsurpassed as it eclipsed the US in sales for the first time in 2009. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) projected in September 2010 that China will achieve 25 million vehicle sales by 2015. In 2009, China’s auto market stood at 13.64 million units, and is expected to surpass 17 million units in 2010. These projections lead to the same conclusion: that China will be far and away the largest vehicle market for the foreseeable future.

India’s automotive story is very compelling in its own right. India’s already substantial vehicle market is rapidly growing, and the country has quickly becoming a major center for the development and manufacture of A and B segment vehicles. According to Global Insight, sales of just over 2 million units in 2009 are projected to increase to over 2.5 million units in 2010 and 4.2 million units by 2015. As will be explained, a combination of economic and non-economic factors account for the difference in vehicle sales between India and China, and the markets have rather significant pricing potentials in certain segments.


THEME 1: Differentiated demand profiles across markets provide limited opportunity for leveraging a common product portfolio in both markets

This was a consistent finding across all the companies examined and at both a vehicle level and at a part and component level. In fact, demand profiles across China and India were radically different with much lower volume price points found in the Indian market. This finding has significant implications for both OEMs and suppliers. Companies hoping to achieve scale across China and India with common parts and components or vehicles will find limited opportunity to do so, though there are exceptions at the top and bottom ends of the market.

Based on income differentials alone, vehicle sales across China and India would be expected to be more comparable than they have been. Analysis of socio-economic data suggests that approximately one half of the difference in the Chinese and Indian personal vehicle markets can be explained by economic factors. Of six socio-economic classes, only the top four exhibit high levels of vehicle purchases[1]. There are slightly greater than three times the number of Chinese households in these socio-economic categories than Indian households. However, personal vehicle sales in China are more than six times those in India. Fuel cost differentials across China and India could also play a small role in vehicle sales and a significant role in vehicle size across the two countries given that the price is 50% higher in dollar terms in India than in China[2]. This leads to the conclusion that while the varied demand profiles are strongly impacted by economic factors, they are more likely the result of more than economic differences alone.

A non-economic factor impacting differentiated vehicle demand profiles is the nature of the Chinese and Indian vehicle infrastructures. Although there are large rural areas within China where roads remain in poor condition, there has been a dramatic improvement in the vehicle infrastructure in Tier 1 and 2 cities. In addition, China now has over 65,000 kilometers of mostly new expressway for drivers to enjoy. In contrast, the vast majority of Indian roads remain in poor condition, including those in major cities. Also, India has only 200 kilometers of expressways to facilitate inter-city travel[3]. The net result is lower four-wheel personal vehicle utility for Indian consumers relative to Chinese consumers.

Taken collectively, both the economic and non-economic factors result in highly differentiated demand profiles for China and India. On average, Chinese purchase more vehicles per capita than Indians and at higher average price-points. The Chinese also purchase larger vehicles on average than Indians. Based on global Insight data, more than 60% of light vehicles purchased in India are in the A & B segments as compared to around 15% in China. In addition, a notably larger proportion of SUVs are sold in India than in China to help navigate the poor road infrastructure. Even within the same vehicle classes, Indians are spending less than Chinese for vehicles.

Over time, there is potential for vehicle demand profiles to become more similar as Indian incomes rise and the road infrastructure improves, and as Chinese government policy creates incentives for Chinese to purchase a larger proportion of A&B segment vehicles.

In our next posting, we will address THEME 2: Differentiated and complementary supply profiles create “islands of opportunity” for leveraging unique capabilities of the resources available in each country.



[1] Canback Dangel data and Booz & Co. analysis

[2] www.nationmaster.com

[3] National Highways Authority of India


Click here to view article at GLGNews

10.26.2010

Profits plunge at Buffett-backed BYD

Financial Times, October 26, 2010

By Patti Waldmeir in Shanghai

BYD, the Chinese electric carmaker backed by Warren Buffett, has announced a 99 per cent drop in third-quarter earnings after its growth strategy plunged the company into fierce competition with Chinese rivals, according to analysts.

Shares in the carmaker fell more than 10 per cent after its earnings statement. News of the profits drop came on top of other setbacks. BYD was recently forced to scale back plans to double sales this year, delay plans to export vehicles to the US, and surrender seven factories after Beijing said they had been built illegally.

After starting life as a maker of rechargeable batteries, BYD built its first branded car in 2005. By last year, the company was China’s fastest-growing carmaker and had taken first place in the Chinese market for compact cars. BYD forecast sales of 800,000 cars this year, up from 400,000 last year, but recently cut that forecast to 600,000 after sales began to slide when government tax incentives for small cars were partially withdrawn.

Shanghai-based analysts said BYD’s growth strategy had backfired, with dealers forced to slash prices to meet the company’s over-ambitious sales target. BYD sales fell 25 per cent in September year on year, as growth in the China market slowed. Sales in the rival joint venture between General Motors and Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation rose by 41 per cent in the same period.

“They are finding out the hard way just how difficult it is to maintain momentum in the hyper-competitive China market,” said Bill Russo, former head of Chrysler in China and head of Synergistics, a Beijing car consultancy.

Tax incentives on small vehicles and the high-profile Buffett investment are no longer providing the same sustaining force as last year, he added, and BYD must begin to compete on the strength of product offerings, which is proving to be more challenging than they may have anticipated.

They are also learning that moving into a mature market like the US with a new brand and distribution network “is not as straightforward as they originally thought,” he adds.

Mike Dunne of Dunne & Co, an Asian auto consultancy, said the recent setback over illegally built factories is not a major cause for concern. “The main issue is this: the car business accounts for 70 per cent of BYD revenues and there is no evidence that BYD has advantages over other companies when it comes to the business of building and selling cars”.

Mr Buffett, who owns 10 per cent of the company through Mid-American Energy Holdings, affirmed his support for BYD last month when he visited several of its facilities in China, saying it would be a leader in electric cars.

Additional reporting by Shirley Chen in Shanghai

Toyota to produce Prius in Thailand

Marketplace Public Radio, October 22, 2010


Toyota has announced it'll start producing the Prius in Thailand next month. This is the first time the hybrid will be produced outside of Japan.

TEXT OF STORY

STEVE CHIOTAKIS: A day after the company announced a massive recall of a million and a half of its vehicles, Toyota has announced it'll start producing the Prius in Thailand next month. That's going to mark the first time the hybrid will be mass-produced outside of Japan. Marketplace's China Bureau Chief Rob Schmitz explains why.


ROB SCHMITZ: A move to sunny, tropical Thailand may seem like the perfect therapy for a company plagued by recalls. But Toyota is not going to Thailand for the beaches. Auto industry expert Bill Russo says a rise in currency is cutting into profits at home and Toyota needs to lower production costs because it's through selling with selling the Prius to a niche market.

BILL RUSSO: If you're going to be successful in mass marketing these types of vehicles, you need to seek economies of scale which comes from larger production footprints in low-cost markets like Thailand.

The move is part of a broader plan at Toyota to sell a million hybrid vehicles a year. So why not seek that economy of scale in a low-cost market like China? First, China forces foreign automakers to enter into joint ventures with Chinese companies. Secondly, hardly anyone in China wants to buy a Prius. Toyota shut down a small assembly plant in China last year due to terrible sales there.

In Shanghai, I'm Rob Schmitz for Marketplace.


10.22.2010

Leveraging China & India for Global Competitiveness: An Introduction

October 23, 2010

By Glenn Hodges and Bill Russo

The economies of the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of

India have captured a great deal of attention among Multi-National

Corporations (MNCs) due to their rapid growth. According to the

projections of the World Bank, China will overtake Japan as the second

largest economy in the world in 2010, while India is expected to rank

eleventh. Near-term projections by the Organization for Economic

Co-operation and Development (OECD) anticipate annual growth for China

averaging over 10% through 2011, which will make it the world’s second

largest economy by 2010. Growth rates in India of over 8% are also expected.

Long-term projections for both these economies anticipate robust growth

through 2040, with China becoming the world’s largest economy by 2030.


These large, rapidly growing economies provide MNCs with substantial

long-term growth potential. This report summarizes how companies

are attempting to leverage their business strategies across China and India.

In particular, we were interested in identifying the ways in which MNCs are

co-leveraging China and India to achieve supply-side and demand- side

competitive advantage.


China and India represent the largest of what are commonly referred to

as the “BRIC group” of countries. Together with Brazil and Russia, these

four countries are typically regarded as the key emerging markets in

terms of population size, economic strength and political influence. The

BRIC group is in fact an artificial construct created by Goldman Sachs in

2003 as more of a tool for marketing the importance of these economies

to the investment banking community. The label tends to ignore the

rather dramatic socio-economic and geo-political differences among the

members of the “group”.

The purpose of our research was motivated in part because of clear

supply-side and demand-side differences across the markets, and was not

an attempt to examine the validity of lumping BRIC countries together

based on the idea that they are similar and can be approached in a similar

manner. On the contrary, this study points to the significance of the

differences across these countries that can in fact be leveraged in their

own right.


On the supply side, both China and India have large low-cost labor

supplies, are in close geographic proximity to each other. This can

potentially facilitate the bi-directional flow of resources (people and

materials) with unique and differentiated capabilities. These differentiated

skill sets that exist in China and India are indeed a potential source of

co-leveraging, but to date, little co-leveraging has actually taken place.

Instead, MNCs have a clear recognition of country-specific comparative

advantages, but are utilizing these skills within a broader network of

capabilities distributed across multiple countries rather than across

China and India specifically.


On the demand side, both countries are rapidly growing markets with

large consumer bases and quickly expanding middle classes, which are

dramatically increasing their income and purchasing power. The

collective purchasing power of these large and growing middle classes

will result in a shift of the epicenter of many value chain elements for

numerous industries from developed markets to China and India. Global

companies need to recognize this fact and pursue the opportunities

created from serving these markets in order to realize their future growth

potential. What we discovered were highly differentiated product markets

which significantly limit, but do not eliminate, the opportunity to present

a similar product portfolio to both countries.


In sum, China-India-specific co-leveraging has been limited by these

countries’ unique demand profiles, and the perceived higher utility of

leveraging China’s and India’s supply profiles in broader multi-country

capability networks to support global product development and

manufacturing efforts.


While cases were examined across several industries, we chose

to focus primarily on the automotive sector. There are three reasons

for this. First, the automotive sector is the largest manufacturing

sector in both China and India. According to the Society of Indian

Automotive Manufacturers (SIAM) and the Chinese Association of

Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), the industry comprises over 20%

of manufacturing GDP in both countries. Second, the heavy involvement

of numerous automotive MNCs in both markets made it an attractive

industry to explore for insights. This provides an opportunity to study

actions within and across China and India, as well as to examine using

these markets as a platform for global expansion. Third, findings for the

automotive sector are generally relevant to most other manufacturing

sectors, especially durable consumer goods.


Based on this research, we have identified four emerging themes around

leveraging China and India for global competitiveness:


1. Differentiated demand profiles across markets provide limited

opportunity for leveraging a common product portfolio in both

markets.

2. Differentiated and complementary supply profiles create “islands of

opportunity” for leveraging unique capabilities of the resources

available in each country.

3. Leading global players seek to leverage horizontal capabilities

resident in China or India to achieve a competitive advantage.

4. New pathways to innovation are made possible by leveraging core

strengths derived from the geographies and capabilities of local

partners.

We will elaborate on each of these themes in our future postings.


Click here to view on GlobalAutoIndustry.com's ASIAtalk eJournal


Click here to view at GLGNews


Car sales accelerating in China

Financial Times, October 22, 2010

Click here to read the article on FT.com

Beijing is at loggerheads with the rest of the world on issues from the Chinese currency to the Nobel peace prize but on one point all the world agrees: Chinese consumers should spend more.

When it comes to buying cars, China seems to be heeding that message. For the past 18 months – spurred in part by government stimulus measures including tax breaks – mainland auto sales have consistently outperformed expectations, making China the world’s largest carmaker in 2009, several years earlier than expected. But now that tax cuts are on the way out, is China’s car industry heading for a hard landing

The answer could have implications beyond the auto industry: Beijing has vowed to change the structure of the Chinese economy to boost the share of domestic consumption, and car sales are a barometer for that plan’s progress.

Last weekend’s meeting of Communist party leaders underlined that the main goal of policy is to boost the share of the economy that goes to household incomes, reducing the dependence on investment and exports.

Consumption increased as a percentage of gross domestic product last year for the first time in nearly a decade but it has been hard to tell how much of this shift was caused by stimulus measures. Analysts are looking to the car industry for signs of whether the consumption boost is sustainable.

At the Ming Qu Auto Trading company in the Shanghai suburbs on Thursday, just as news emerged that Chinese economic growth had slowed to 9.6 per cent in the third quarter, sales manager Ji Minxiang says government stimulus had only a temporary effect on sales – and often not the one it had intended.

He says Chinese consumers typically react perversely to tax cuts: they buy when taxes are rising and stop buying when taxes are falling – on the grounds that it is silly to buy until prices have hit rock bottom.

So sales of the Geely Panda mini-compact car from his showroom grew when taxes rose at the end of last year. He hopes rumours of another tax increase at the end of this year will spur another rally.

But either way, Mr Ji and auto industry analysts in China all agree: government stimulus measures in China are marginal: Mike Dunne of Dunne & Co, an Asian auto consultancy, says last year’s tax cuts were only a “minor event in the spectacular surge in demand that began in 2002”, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure development and low penetration of car ownership in China.

China’s car market has grown at a compound annual growth rate of more than 30 per cent for the past decade, says Bill Russo of Synergistics, a Beijing auto consultancy, and former head of Chrysler in China. Last year’s 40 per cent-plus growth was accelerated by stimulus measures, “but this is by no means the fundamental driver behind the growth over the past decade”, he says.

Ivo Naumann, head of Alix Partners Shanghai office, says car penetration in China is still very low, even compared with emerging markets such as Brazil and Russia.

China’s light vehicle penetration is only 30 per 1,000 people compared with 206 per 1,000 in Russia and 559 per 1,000 in Italy, he says. Further car industry growth will be driven by the fact that more and more households are passing the minimum income threshold to afford a car, with this number expected to double in the next five years from 35m to 70m households.

JD Power, the auto consultancy, says China car sales have surpassed expectations so far this year, in spite of the partial withdrawal of tax cuts at the end of last year, causing them to raise their forecast for 2010 to more than 18m units.

The government stimulus did have a role in overcoming a temporary attack of caution on the part of Chinese car buyers during the most uncertain months of the global economic crisis. “The December 2008 stimulus and tax breaks gave consumers a fresh dose of confidence to move ahead with planned purchases . . . But such incentives were sideshows to the big picture – sustained, explosive hunger for new cars,” says Mr Dunne.

10.21.2010

China’s emerging automotive might a challenge for steel

Steel Business Briefing, October 8, 2010

Click here to view the article published at steelbb.com

Soaring automotive demand in China – which saw January-June sales jump 48% year-on-year to 9.03m units – presents opportunities and challenges for global steelmakers.

Bill Russo, senior advisor to consultants Booz & Company, notes that car sales in China reached 13.64m units last year and seem set to reach 17m this year, another record high.

“China will become the world’s largest auto market – forever!” Russo told delegates at the World Steel Association conference in Tokyo this week, attended by
Steel Business Briefing.

Arguing that when a country’s threshold of mobility lies near $10,000 of GDP per capita automobile ownership accelerates, he said: “China is just hitting the rapid growth phase now.”

At China’s current rate of development and fuel consumption, by 2020 the country will have over 150m vehicles on its roads and petroleum consumption will exceed 250m tonnes. Russo says Beijing is aware of the environmental implications of this and is working to promote development of fuel efficient cars, electric vehicles and other technologies.

The implication for the world steel industry, Russo argued, is that steelmakers must cease seeing themselves as mere suppliers of steel and become closer partners with car companies, which are increasingly relying on steel mills to deliver advanced vehicle technologies.

For example, he notes that by 2015, Chinese steelmakers will be supplying 71% of a car’s body structure, compared with just 45% today. Russo cited the example of Baosteel’s partnership with Chinese automakers, including Geely, Chery, Dongfeng and Chongqing Chang’An in a RMB 500m ($75m) project to develop stronger and lighter materials.