9.20.2009

China will face high risk to automobile quality in the future

Southern Weekly (南方周末), September 20, 2009

中国未来将面临汽车质量的高风险,本土厂商应明确自己的战略定位

刘丁 北京

针对最近频发的召回事件,本报专访Synergistics Limited公司的创始人及总裁,前克莱斯勒亚洲区总裁罗威(Bill Russo)先生。

《南方周末》:您如何理解最近中国市场上的大规模频繁召回事件?
罗威:当汽车企业开始追求市场份额时,很多坏的事情就发生了,他们开始追求投资、追求时间表。

丰田过去历史上一直是关注质量,丰田的产品曾经是高质量、高价值的品牌,但最近,5-10年之间,他们变得更贪婪,他们提出的目标是到2010年达到50%的国际市场份额,他们开始追求利润、财务表现和规模,而不是像原来一样追求质量,他们成长的太快了,所以发生了大量召回的事情。丰田的问题,就是他们离开了他们的核心原则。

而目前,所有在中国的汽车公司都在追求市场份额,这就是问题所在,中国的市场竞争将越来越激烈,而汽车公司在竞争下的则变得贪婪和短视,虽然谁都不想自己的产品有问题,但如果你盯住的战略是高增长,市场份额和利润,那么小心了,你将很容易偏离你原来的高质量原则。

况且,中国的游戏规则也不同,你必须与本土企业合资,所以关系也很复杂。所以,出问题的风险也远远高于其他地方。

你为之奋斗了一个世纪,你的重质量的名气,但毁掉它只需要几秒钟。市场就是这样,你过去一个世纪在市场上口碑不好,那即便你今天很努力去追求质量,市场也不信,重建需要很长的时间。

《南方周末》:中国本土汽车企业怎么应对?

罗威:世界汽车工业史上,汽车公司有三种不同的战略方向:1、低价山寨。2、以消费者体验为中心。3、技术和特有品牌。

低价是就是给予价钱够低的产品,中国目前以及韩国的发展模式便是如此。但这种类型已经过时了,因为市场越来越成熟;技术和特有的,就是欧洲和美国克莱斯勒,宝马奔驰,他们有自己特有的车型,与众不同的,让人觉得是唯一的,别人无法模仿而得到价值;而以消费者体验为中心,就是丰田这种,重质量。

但丰田后来偏离了原来的路,而在了不同的方向上徘徊。如果你太短视,太追求利润,就会不重成本,只要卖出去就行,追求产销量。

但丰田即便在今天,仍然是最好的榜样,如何满足消费者的心理和质量控制。他们的模式依然是世界上最棒的模式之一。我们应该看,丰田如何处理危机。最好的办法,是迅速反应,为错误承担责任,即便会影响今天的利润,但对于长期是至关重要的。

中国将成为世界汽车工业的目标,因为他增长的如此之快,所有的企业都要过来,所以,中国企业如何与世界的强手们竞争,将是非常有趣的事情。以后会越来越艰难,即便它增长很快,但依然会越来越艰难,因为越来越多的企业来到这里。中国汽车企业应当尽早找到他们自己的战略定位。

Click here to see the original interview posted by Southern Weekly


9.17.2009

丰田危机 (Toyota Deals With China's Largest Recall)

Southern Weekly(南方周末) , September 16, 2009

丰田公司曾经以其发明的丰田生产方式,获得了质量冠军的美誉,并因此打败了美国底特律的强大对手。但现在,它却一再地被汽车质量问题所困扰。这一切,都发生在它日渐身躯庞大、争夺世界第一的路途中

今年8月,全球第一大汽车制造商丰田公司,宣布在中国召回68万余辆汽车,原因是由同一供货商提供的装配在卡罗拉、凯美瑞等流行车型上的自动窗开关部件存在安全隐患。

这是中国市场上最大规模的一次召回事件。“毫无疑问,除了要为之付出的经济成本,以重视质量而著称的丰田品牌,将因此蒙受巨大损失。” 克莱斯勒汽车公司前副总裁罗威对南方周末记者评论。

9.16.2009

Expert: Protectionism no cure to economy

China Daily, September 17, 2009

A US auto industry expert criticized Wednesday the recent Obama administration's protectionism decision to increase tire tariff on imported Chinese tires as a "blockage" to the circulatory system which will not cure the economy but likely to prolong and worsen the economic problems.

In an interview with Xinhua, Bill Russo, president and founder of Synergistics Limited who has over 15 years as an automotive executive including 5 years of experience in China and Asia, said "trade protectionism does not work historically."

When commenting on the effect of this tariff hike, Russo used historical example to illustrate his point of view. "Trade protectionism does not work historically. During the great depression, US increased import tariff on many thousand commodities, but it did not cure the economy and it most likely prolonged and worsened the economic problems."

He further explained: "You can use the metaphor of protectionism as a 'blockage' to the circulatory system that depends on free and open trading among countries. Currently, industries such as automotive are struggling to recover from the global financial crisis. An already fragile system is made more fragile when such measures are taken because of the net impact on overall global supply chain and logistics costs."

He warned that trade protectionism will restrict the circulatory system of the global economy, and protectionism is contagious which will spread all over the world and worsen the economic situation.

Talking about the long term impact, he said: "Over time, as global economies become more interdependent and as industries pursue cross-border alliances similar to Renault-Nissan and Fiat- Chrysler, Opel-Magna, and others, it will become apparent that such protectionist measures are actually of limited benefit on both the consumer and manufacturer side."

Obama administration imposed punitive tariffs on low-end tires from China this week. The US decision takes effect on September 26.

According to report, Obama cited a surge in Chinese imports that could destabilize domestic manufacturers as the reason for such decision. However, Chinese statistics show tire exports to the United States rose by 2 percent in 2008, and fell by more than 15 percent in the first half of 2009.

Click here to view original posting in China Daily


9.08.2009

The Electric Car - Will China Dominate the Market?

EU Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, Thursday 24th Sep 2009 4:00pm

Click here to view full event description

The Copenhagen Debates come to Shanghai!

The Speakers

Mr. Bill Russo, Founder and President, Synergistics Limited and Senior Advisor, Booz & Company


Mr. Benjamin Thoma, Senior Consultant, Roland Berger

Agenda

4.00 - 4.30pm – Registration/Networking
4.30 - 4.35pm - Opening words by EUCCC
4.35 - 5.00pm - Presentation by Mr. Bill Russo
5.00 - 5.25pm - Presentation by Mr. Benjamin Thoma
5.25 - 6.00pm - Q&A
6.00 - Networking drinks (coupon for glass of wine or beer given at reception desk)



Profile of the "Golden Age of the Auto Industry" (中文)

China Entrepreneur Magazine, September 8, 2009

2009年,汽車業深陷危機泥潭。但是,博斯公司的調研卻認為:我們將迎來汽車業的“金磚”時代——汽車業高速發展的黃金時代尚未到來,“金磚四國”則是未來引爆點。博斯的研究發現:

  金磚四國擁有完全不同的市場和行業動態,到2018年,快速發展經濟體的汽車擁有量預計將擴大近六倍;

  傳統的“歐美模式”將被顛覆,不能寄希望照搬歐美的模式在亞洲或者拉美複製成功;

  要徹底改變汽車企業賣車的思維,不能只是側重於工程技術,而是要解決消費者出行的問題;

  新能源汽車領域尚未出現相應的市場領導品牌,中國企業可以通過此舉搶佔先機。

  “他們的失敗在於固守傳統”

  他們仍然生活在過去,所以問題不在於他們會不會失敗,而在於他們何時會失敗

  “全球汽車業的重心已經轉移了”,博斯公司高級專家、前克萊斯勒東北亞區副總裁羅威(Bill Russo)如此直言不諱,“他們仍然生活在過去”。對汽車行業來說,這是一個偶像倒掉的時代。既往成功者的失敗,可以讓更多的人從更深的層次正視原有商業模式存在的問題。擁有超越谷底的視野才能看到未來的黃金時代。

Click here to view complete article.


9.05.2009

TREND #5: Utilization of China's Automotive Capacities for Global Expansion

September 5, 2009

by Bill Russo

The fifth of the Eight Overarching China Automotive Trends That Are Revolutionizing the Auto Industry deals with how the growth and development of the China automotive market changes the automotive business model for the global auto industry. While it is obvious that China already has become the world’s factory for “everyday low price” merchandise, the ramifications of the rapid development of the Chinese automotive base on the global auto industry may not be as intuitively obvious. I call this trend "Utilization of China's Automotive Capacities for Global Expansion", but it is not simply about exporting finished vehicles from China. Rather the more significant trend is how other elements of the automotive value chain are impacted by the development of China's automotive capacities and capabilities.

China has rapidly become the largest car market in the world. For the first half of 2009, China posted sales of 6.1 million units versus 4.8 million vehicles sold in the US market. It now seems like all the ingredients are there for the “Chinese automotive factory” to expand to the global markets. In fact, much of the content in cars sold in the US and elsewhere today already does come from China. Because a significant percentage of the total cost of a car is in the manufactured components, there has already been a significant movement of the production of supplied parts to China. A great many of the components used in cars today either are or can quickly be manufactured in China. This is purely driven by the efficiencies gained from sourcing in China. As noted in the NPR piece U.S. Cars Have a Little Bit of China: what you may not realize is how much Chinese content may already be in your current car. However, our focus here is on the globalization of China’s automotive capacities.

Despite the rally in China’s domestic sales, China’s largest car exporters reported fewer export sales in 2009 when compared with last year. China auto insiders have pointed to the overall decline in worldwide demand as the reason, particularly in such key markets as Russia where protectionist measures have had a direct impact on vehicles entering the market. But this is not a complete explanation. The challenges faced by China’s domestic companies in their efforts to go global were covered in detail in my previous article entitled The Path to Globalization of China’s Automotive Industry (posted on this blog on May 18, 2009).

As a result of the unprecedented restructuring of the global automotive industry, several OEMs and suppliers have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and are in the process of restructuring and selling assets. Going forward, global automotive companies have been forced to radically and often involuntarily rethink their global footprint. Several examples have already been noted in TREND #2: Global Redistribution of Assets by Non-Chinese Companies to Capture China Market Growth. Clearly, the global center of gravity of automotive strength is shifting east.

If we look out over the next decade, one can with confidence anticipate a resumption of global auto market growth, particularly fueled by economic recovery and robust demand from emerging markets. This will create many opportunities for the reconfigured industry with its new “Asia –centric” footprint.

Leveraging Regional Automotive Capacities and Capabilities

The reality of the 21st century globalized auto industry is that businesses models must be redesigned to fully leverage the capabilities that are now accessible in newly emerging markets. Unfortunately, in order to become global, most automotive OEMs have attempted to export a business model optimized for their home market to their international locations. Migrating development capacities to markets that lack the competency to perform the work misses the entire point of globalization. Pursuing cheap parts or cheap labor is ultimately self-defeating when doing so robs an organization of its core competencies, thereby accelerating their demise. Similarly, exporting a business model designed for the home market to foreign markets only serves to limit the ability of the organization to embrace the capabilities of the foreign market.

Automotive manufacturers in concert with their key stakeholders must redefine their business models for the new reality of 21st century competition. Going global is not a simple transplant of the current business model to a foreign location. This implies a transformation of the entire automotive value chain to leverage the opportunities made possible by globalized capabilities. It involves redesigning business processes across the value chain in order to deliver to the customer a brand with a Unique Selling Proposition (USP) relevant to the local consumer. This will require that 21st century global auto companies fundamentally rethink their entire value chain from the consumer back through sales and service, production, supply and R&D. Key stakeholder groups, including the national governments with an interest in the global competitiveness of their domestic auto industry, must contribute to this development.

Businesses capable of leveraging global capabilities will ultimately be able to deliver a relevant USP at much lower cost. The Logan produced by Renault in India is one good example. Through engine re-engineering and parts simplification, Renault successfully adapted this car to be more cost efficient and easy to repair for Indian customers.

International OEMs are doing two types of differentiation in overseas markets, such as China. The first practice is the local adaptation on top of existing platforms. This is represented as changes to styling, functions and features to meet local regulatory requirement and market tastes. Recent examples are extended wheelbase luxury cars such as Volvo S80L and Audi A4L, the refreshed Buick Regal and LaCrosse, and the Hyundai Elantra Yuedong. Excellent sales have resulted from delivering products tailored to the local consumer taste - delivered at a cost made possible from the cost efficiencies and scale achievable in the China market.

The second type of differentiation is development of a brand new vehicle “top hat” (uniquely styled upper body with common chassis and powertrain). Products such as the Lavida by Shanghai VW are excellent examples of low-cost derivatives from a global VW platform tailored to the taste of the local consumer.

China’s Emerging Role in the Global Auto Industry

Over the next 5-10 years, China will be the world largest auto market, and for reasons noted in TREND #4: China's Investment in New Energy Vehicles and Associated Infrastructure also the most fuel-efficient market. China’s sales growth will be also fueled by small displacement cars demand from those 1st time buyers from Tier 3 and 4 cities. This has a profound impact on China's capacity to leverage the scale and competencies which accrue from becoming the largest production base for energy efficient vehicles.

From the supply side, we can foresee the trend of consolidation of vehicle makers, growth of local brands, and development of New Energy Vehicles. The future belongs to those who can extend their capabilities beyond low-cost production and supply to areas of world-class R&D and brand management - essential steps on the path to globalization. It is important to note that opportunities to integrate these capabilities into the business system are available to both local firms as well as multi-national companies. One of the poorest assumptions made by industry analysts when observing the China auto market is they often assume that only Chinese firms will ultimately benefit from the growth of the Chinese market - and they must therefore eventually dominate the global industry. This is a simplistic view, particularly when one considers that foreign brands still hold about two-thirds of the share of the Chinese domestic market.

However, Chinese auto companies are developing rapidly and aspire to become global companies. SAIC and FAW already possess significant scale advantages as a result of their successful JVs. FAW’s own brand B50, B70 and Xiali products are well received by market. Chang’An group has recently demonstrated market leadership and capability in the small car segment. Chery has developed full range of products with their own platforms, transmissions, and engines.

One must also take note of the astonishing rise of independent companies such as BYD, Great Wall and Geely. BYD – a cell phone and battery maker aspiring to become a leader in electric vehicles has clearly startled the world by delivering the first mass-produced plug-in EV. Several of these independent companies can become successful global car companies.

Several Chinese companies may prove capable of becoming icons of the 21st century global auto industry. However, they must also learn the lessons from the failure of the 20th century industry icons, who ultimately became “healthcare and insurance providers backed by vehicle sales”.

In the next posting in this series, I will describe the trend "Hyper-Competition Across the China Automotive Market Segments".

Click here to read this article on GLG News

Click here to view article published in Gasgoo.com China Automotive News

Click here to read this article published in GlobalAutoIndustry.com CHINAtalk

Click below to view:

8.27.2009

Southern Weekly (南方周末) Publication of "China's Next Revolution: Transforming the Global Automotive Industry"

Southern Weekly (南方周末), August 26, 2009


Click here to read the English version originally published on this blog.

Also, Please see reposts on: Sina.com Nanfang Daily Dayoo.com

Southern Weekly, also referred to as Southern Weekend (Chinese: 南方周末; Pinyin: Nánfāng Zhōumò) is a weekly newspaper based in Guangzhou, China, and a sister publication of the newspaper Southern Daily (Chinese: 南方日報) Southern Weekend is one of China’s most popular newspapers, and is owned by the independent-minded Southern Daily Group (Chinese: 南方報業集团) The New York Times described the Southern Weekend as "China's most influential liberal newspaper".