8.22.2009

TREND #4: China's Investment in New Energy Vehicles and Associated Infrastructure

August 22, 2009

by Bill Russo

The fourth of the Eight Overarching China Automotive Trends That Are Revolutionizing the Auto Industry was highlighted by this author in the article China's Next Revolution: Transforming the Global Automotive Industry (posted on this blog on June 18, 2009). Several macroeconomic and sociopolitical challenges are directly linked with the automotive industry: the redistribution of global economic power, energy dependence, global trade balance and environmental concerns. The rapid rise of the Asian economies – especially China – are sending shock waves through a system that was already out of balance in many of these areas.
The global economic crisis presents the world with a compelling case for change, and truly transformational changes often occur during times of crisis. The economic crisis is a triggering event that freezes debate on whether change is needed and creates opportunities for collaboration between government and industry. Such collaboration is essential for the successful transition from the conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) to new energy vehicle (NEV) technology.
As we have described in detail previously, the balance of global economic power has been shifting eastward to places like India and particularly China. Most of the recent growth in the world’s auto industry has been in the Asia-Pacific region, and more than half of that growth over the next decade is forecasted to come from China. Since 2003 China's vehicle market has more than doubled in size from 4.56 million units to 9.67 million units in 2008. In this time period, The passenger vehicle (extract the buses, trucks and other commercial vehicles) share has grown from 50% to over 60%.
Given the recent economic downturn, the China government undertook a series of focused stimulus actions designed to help achieve a GDP target of 8%. Through the first half of 2009, these measures already had a dramatic impact on the automotive market as Chinese consumers – many of whom were first time buyers – took advantage of tax and other incentives that were made available. For the first half of 2009, China surpassed the U.S. in total car sales, posting sales of 6.1 million units against 4.8 million vehicles sold in the U.S. from January through June.
China’s rapid automotive growth is expected to continue. The market is forecast to account for more than half of the Asia-Pacific market expansion over the next decade, with over 6% annual growth through 2018. As China’s auto market continues to grow, pollution significantly increases while China’s self-sufficiency rate of crude oil continues to decrease. To encourage the use of more fuel-efficient and less polluting vehicles, the central government’s 2009 stimulus plan included objectives for increasing the proportion of smaller vehicles in the China market. Related initiatives include a 50% reduction in the sales tax for under 1.6-liter vehicles, additional taxes on larger vehicles, and a relaxation of restrictions on small cars. The government’s stated objective as part of the plan is to achieve a market share target of 40% for 1.5-liter engine vehicles and below, and a share of 15% for vehicles with engines at or smaller than 1.0-liter. Overall affordability as well as the shift toward consumer versus institutional sales will also continue to support the development of smaller vehicles.
As the size of the auto market inexorably expands, China will play an increasingly key role in the development of new automotive technologies. China’s emergence as the leading automotive market in terms of sales has several implications. While most attention has been paid to relative sales performance of the foreign and domestic companies, what is arguably of more long-term significance is the impact of China’s market expansion on energy consumption and environment. Ten years ago, Bejing, Xi’an, Shenyang, Shanghai and Guangzhou were already listed among the Top 10 cities with the worst air pollution. The massive growth of the automotive market only adds to the problem. Additionally, China imports two-thirds of its oil, and its ever-increasing thirst has had a dramatic impact on global energy prices. No doubt, China has a clear and compelling need to reinvent the propulsion technology of the automobile.
To address this, China’s stimulus measures are targeting initiatives to increase energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing energy intensity, increasing the share of renewable energy used, implementing tough auto emissions standards, and adding investments for clean energy. China’s Minister of Science and Technology, Mr. Wan Gang – a former automotive development engineer for Audi – has recently unveiled a plan to support the development of what China calls “New Energy Vehicles” (NEVs). The Ministry of Science and Technology, working with the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission, is sponsoring an ambitious plan to promote the use of NEVs initially targeting 13 pilot cities, which include Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, Changchun, Dalian, Hangzhou, Jinan, Wuhan, Shenzhen, Hefei, Changsha, Kunming, and Nanchang. The plan includes support for the development of energy-saving technology for use in government fleets, including buses, postal, and sanitation vehicles. The plan targets the deployment of 60,000 energy saving vehicles in China by 2012.

Both universities and vehicle manufacturers have already responded to the government initiatives. For example, Tsinghua University has established an alternative powertrain research lab. Chinese auto brands are participating in NEV development (some with foreign partners) and have included plans in their long-term strategies. Developments include the following:

  • SAIC: Invested RMB 2 billion for NEV development
  • Chang 'An: Established NEV JV and plans first hybrid car for 2009
  • FAW / DFM: Have hybrid buses in pilot operation
  • Chery: Introduced plans for the hybrid car A5 and electric car S18
  • BYD: Introduced plans for the F3DM dual-mode electric car

Replacing internal combustion engines with other technologies- such as hybrid electric, full electric, hydrogen powered vehicles or clean diesel - requires collaboration between business and government to develop the infrastructure in tandem with development of the technology. The economics of the product itself and ultimate market acceptance is very much dependent on the availability of the infrastructure to recharge or replenish the fuel. It’s not realistic to expect a company to reinvent the technological underpinnings of the automobile unless there is a concurrent development and investment in the infrastructure to support that new technology vehicle. This is especially true in today’s weakened global economy.

As the largest automotive market, and because the China government has the capacity and willingness to invest in the infrastructure for alternative propulsion, the technology will eventually come to the market. What makes the development of alternative propulsion technology particularly challenging is not simply the vehicle itself - but the need for invention of the infrastructure for delivering renewable sources of electricity and installation of battery charging/replacement stations.

As the largest car market, and the place with the largest need for alternative energy solutions, we can expect to see China place a heavy emphasis on development of the electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. The country that leads the development of this infrastructure will undoubtedly lead in attracting the investment in development of the technologies that plug in to that infrastructure.

Consumer acceptance of new energy vehicles is yet another challenge. While the infrastructure investments already described will help tip the scales in favor of new energy vehicles, consumers must also be convinced that the price and performance of the new energy vehicle can in fact meet their expectations. As a national priority, we can expect the China government to help by offering incentives for the retail consumer to purchase new energy vehicles. Chinese consumers have less experience with gasoline-powered cars, and are already accustomed to short distance, low-speed commuting – conditions very favorable for electric cars.

The China government’s willingness to invest in the infrastructure to support alternative propulsion technology will ultimately help drive market acceptance. This is where China has the opportunity to take the lead, and that will drive investment in new technology. It takes a combination of business and government working together to make such a transformational change possible – and nowhere in the world is there a closer link between business and government than in China.

In the next posting in this series, I will describe the "Utilization of China's Automotive Capacities for Global Expansion".

Click here to read this article on GLG News
Click here to view article published in Gasgoo.com China Automotive News
Click below to view:


8.20.2009

EV Li-Ion Battery Forum 2009

September 2-3, 2009
Hyatt on the Bund, Shanghai

Bill Russo will chair a panel session on Day 1 at 17:00 on Marketing To End Users The Residual Value Of The Li-ion Battery Pack To Lower The Costs Of Electric Vehicles.

8.15.2009

TREND #3: Acquisition of Foreign Assets and Key Development Competencies by Chinese Companies

August 15, 2009

by Bill Russo


The forces shaping the third of the Eight Overarching China Automotive Trends That Are Revolutionizing the Auto Industry were addressed in my article entitled The Path to Globalization of China’s Automotive Industry (posted on this blog on May 18, 2009). The principal focus of this piece was to explain the challenges faced by Chinese Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in their efforts to develop and expand, and how the global financial crisis was presenting China's automotive industry with an unprecedented opportunity to accelerate their industrial development by "inorganically" acquiring the assets of foreign manufacturers.

The highly fragmented nature of the domestic Chinese auto industry presents challenges to the longer-term development of the domestic industry. The fact that that there are over 150 registered manufacturers is an outgrowth of a start-up phase for China’s auto sector. Provincial governments, with the support of the central government, were encouraged to develop industrial bases to create investment opportunities and jobs in order to accelerate China’s economic development. However, the highly fragmented industry that results from this creates enormous inefficiencies in the area of capital investment. This fragmentation also makes it very difficult to focus and allocate resources to the development of critical technologies related to safety and fuel economy. This is an area of particular weakness for Chinese OEMs who have relied on their foreign partners to lead the development of key component technologies.

While the China policy makers have prioritized the need for strengthening its industry via consolidation of the domestic players, the simple fact is that the global financial crisis has created a need to rethink the global allocation of automotive assets. As noted in the previous article in this series, many non-Chinese manufacturers are shifting their focus from their domestic markets to the growth markets like China. However, many are in a position to dispose of assets that are no longer critical to the business going forward. The historic restructuring underway in the global automotive industry will undoubtedly result in a redistribution or liquidation of automotive OEM assets. Whole companies, brands with installed dealer networks, product platforms and associated component technologies are all available for a mere fraction of the investment needed to create these assets. It stands to reason that such an "inorganic" approach to development could significantly shorten the time frame for going global.

While Chinese firms have learned very quickly how to assemble cars and develop supply chains, they are very inexperienced at the vehicle development and synthesis process. An automobile is a complex engineered system requiring advanced technology and know-how in order to test and validate the achievement of benchmark targets in the areas of performance, fuel economy, safety and quality. It is in this area that Chinese firms are weakest. Chinese vehicles, while improving rapidly, are still not up to the world-class standards required to compete in the mature markets of the world. As a result, numerous Chinese firms are seeking opportunities to acquire foreign assets for a fraction of the cost of their original development. Many noteworthy examples include the potential sale of Ford's Volvo brand, GM's Opel and Hummer brands, and Chrysler's discontinued products and powertrains. While China's policy makers have urged caution in bids with the Big 3, they remain supportive of deals which bring critical technologies to the domestic industry. Such a deal was Geely's $58M acquisition of Australian transmission manufacturer Drivetrain Systems International.

By acquiring the assets of a distressed but well-known international manufacturer, Chinese auto companies are hoping to significantly accelerate their development and expansion plans. Chinese companies with global ambitions who are considering a major acquisition would do well to study the lessons learned from those who have tried to create a cross-border alliance. While it may be relatively easy to negotiate a deal to acquire such assets, there is enormous risk and the vast majority of cross-border acquisitions ultimately fail. The most recent case of SAIC’s acquisition of Ssangyong ultimately failed because the interests of both parties were not aligned. SAIC was: unable to secure concessions from Ssangyong’s labor union to lower costs, unwilling to inject billons of RMB incremental capital to fund the business, and unable to manage the loss of leadership at Ssangyong. Ultimately, SAIC decided to dissolve the deal. Sadly, cross-border acquisitions are rarely successful. The 9-year marriage of Daimler-Benz and Chrysler dissolved in 2007 largely driven by an incompatibility of products, brands, business models and management structures.

Even the more successful partnerships have had mixed results: by all measures, the Ford alliance with Mazda has been a very good example of a successful cross-border alliance. Ford benefited from access to Mazda’s fuel-efficient technologies and platforms, and both sides benefited from a shared global production and distribution footprint. However, Ford recently made the decision to liquidate its shares in Mazda in order to raise much-needed cash. Lenovo’s acquisition of IBM’s PC division is largely viewed as a success because of the compatible interests of both sides, but had to overcome challenges from the US authorities fearful of national security risks. It remains to be seen if the merged company will be a stronger competitor in a highly competitive electronics industry.

Clearly there is a need, on the part of the European and North American OEMs and suppliers, to find additional sources of funding in order to keep their operations going, while the rapid growth of China auto market in recent years has provided Chinese companies more capacity to invest. The shifting of economic and industrial power to the east will require a corresponding redistribution of the asset base of the industry. However, there are real challenges in finding suitable partners. Partners in the west are not necessarily going be compatible, both from a technological and from a cultural standpoint with a Chinese suitor. A Chinese company investing in a western company or its assets must understand how to align the interests of the partner in the transaction with their own, or they will likely end up owning assets without the technological development know-how that went into creating those assets. It all should start with a comprehensive risk-assessment and plan for post-acquisition integration. I described the key areas of risk mitigation in a recent interview entitled "China companies shouldn't jump too early or take on too much in acquiring foreign suppliers".

While there is every reason to doubt that Chinese domestic firms are ready to take on a foreign acquisition, it is happening. Those who dare take on such acquisitions are also wise to learn the lessons from others who have tried – and often failed – to use an acquisition to accelerate the process.

In the next posting in this series, I will describe "China's Investment in New Energy Vehicles and Associated Infrastructure".

Click here to read this article on GLG News
Click here to view article published in Gasgoo.com China Automotive News

8.11.2009

Chery revives IPO plans for expansion, perception boost

China Economic Review, August 2, 2009

In mid-July, Anhui-based Chery Automobile announced it would resume plans for a domestic stock listing it had shelved in March 2008. The company didn't give a timeline for the listing or say how much it expects to raise, but analysts said it's not surprising Chery is talking listing now. Markets are rallying – contributing to Beijing’s decision to lift the freeze on initial public offerings in late June – and Chery would be wise to seize the moment.

“It needs to raise capital if it is going to expand both domestically and internationally,” said Bill Russo, president of Synergistics Limited, a Beijing-based business consultancy with a focus on the auto industry.

Russo said Chery's plans for expansion are ambitious and include entering into mature markets such as North America, Europe and Australia. The company has also expanded from one to four brands – Chery, Karry, Riich, and Rely – to target businesses and higher-end consumers.

Chery currently has the capacity it needs to fulfill domestic demand. An IPO, however, would give the company the funding it needs to finance its brand roll-out and build up technical and production capacity. More funding would also help Chery build up dealer networks internationally to compete against established international players in their home markets.

But an IPO would be about more than just additional capital. It would also help Chery to change from a locally government-owned company into a publicly listed company, said John Zeng, senior market analyst for Asia automotive research with IHS Global Insight.

“Their financial information will be more transparent and their corporate governance structure will be more visible. Government officials won’t be able to put as much influence on the company,” Zeng said.

He cautions, however, that the degree of change depends on what percentage of Chery is publicly tradable. Synergistics’ Russo said he expected about 20% of the company to be listed, noting that while Chery would remain a state-owned firm, a listing would help with public perception.

“A Chinese company that doesn’t list has a perception of lack of transparency as to its true financial status,” said Russo. “So the process of listing will go a long way in alleviating those fears.”

While having little effect on the company’s operations, analysts say a listing would be more than cosmetic. While Chery is not the first Chinese automaker to pursue a listing, the company’s size and high profile mean that it could nonetheless send a strong signal to the international community.

“It’s another sign that the Chinese car manufacturers are taking steps to become global players, and a warning for the international players that the Chinese are there and wanting to get into the international market also,” said Klaus Paur, director of automotive research for North Asia, Greater China and Korea at TNS.

Perceptions are worth little without the products to back them up. Paur says Chery does not have the high-quality products needed to compete against international brands selling in China. That could cause problems for the development of the company’s luxury and business brands.

“If you’re not able to deliver the products that go along with your brand ambition then you destroy your brand image,” Paur said. Confidence from the market and financial community of Chery’s ability to deliver on its brand promises would determine its success or failure on the financial markets, he said.

The risks are unlikely to deter the company from pursuing its IPO, however.

“[Chery] had wanted to do this for quite some time, but with the meltdown last year they didn’t press the button,” said Synergistics’ Russo. “Now seems like an opportune time with the markets starting to rebound.”

8.07.2009

TREND #2: Global Redistribution of Assets by Non-Chinese Companies to Capture China Market Growth

August 8, 2009

by Bill Russo

As noted in the introduction to this series, I believe we are witnessing the early stages of an economic revolution: a shift of the global center of gravity of economic strength towards the east which will result in profound changes in numerous industries. As an economic bellwether, the automotive industry captures a great deal of interest.

We are fortunate to be living in historic times. While in the grip of the most severe economic contraction since the 1930s, it is in such times – and only in such times - that truly transformational structural change is possible. The global car industry has long suffered from overcapacity resulting from overly ambitious assumptions for market growth combined with optimism surrounding whatever product or technology was being offered. Ambition and optimism are the first victims of a recession as businesses struggle to realign to a new world economic order. This translates into a major redirection in capital spending and asset reallocation as businesses attempt to reconfigure themselves in order to regain a profitable footing. Many businesses are reallocating assets from slower to higher growth markets, or otherwise selling assets or disposing assets deployed in their weakened home markets.

It is interesting to note how the financial crisis – while impacting the entire global economy – has been felt to varying degrees in different markets. While negative GDP growth is anticipated for 2009 in the Euro Zone, the US, and Japan, stimulus measures taken in China have yielded remarkable growth in many sectors of its economy. China's stimulus plan provided UD $588 Bn of investment, of which 45% was targeted at infrastructure development. The Auto Industry Revitalization Plan implemented in March 2009 included specific measures to spark consumer demand for automobiles, including:
  • Establishment of eight development goals for the industry from 2009 to 2011 to ensure domestic growth of automobile production and sales
  • Reduction of half of sales tax for 1.6 liter or smaller cars
  • Implementation of policies to boost auto sales in the countryside including subsidy for new minibus or light truck sales for rural residents

All indicators point to the likelihood that China will exceed its 8% GDP growth target in 2009. Taken in the context of a longer time horizon, it is also apparent that in the past three decades, the major Asian growth economies of China and India are in fact returning towards their historic share of world GDP. The net result of these developments has been a significant redistribution of the relative strength of the global automotive markets.

In fact, China has surpassed the US in automotive sales for each of the first 6 months of 2009, selling 6.1 million vehicles over this period compared with 4.8 million new vehicles in the US. In fact, since 2003 China’s vehicle market has more than doubled in size from 4.56 million units to 9.67 million units (in 2008). Of this total, 61%, or 5.91 million units, represent passenger vehicles (extract the buses, trucks and other commercial vehicles). The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers forecasts sales for 2009 will top 11 million vehicles, revising upward its prior forecast of 10.2 million vehicles. Given recent developments, and barring a sudden and unexpected recovery in US demand, China will likely surpass the US market in sales for the overall calendar year 2009.

Looking forward, Global Insight has forecasted that the Asian markets represent the largest growth potential in the global auto industry…with a combined 4.7% compound annual growth rate over the next 10 years (compared with 2.9% in NAFTA). Within Asia, 54% of that growth is expected to come from China. As a result of these developments, the global automotive industry must fundamentally rethink its structure in terms of regional allocation of capital investment and capacity.


Global automotive companies have been forced to radically and often involuntarily rethink their global footprint. For example, General Motors is in the process of completely unwinding its European operations with the sale of its Opel, Vauxhall and Saab brands. In their North American operations, GM is in the process of selling its Hummer and Saturn brands, and terminating the Oldsmobile and Pontiac brand. At the same time, GM has continued to invest in expanding its capacity in the rapidly growing China market. Similarly, Ford has sold its Land Rover and Jaguar brands to Tata Automotive, and is in the process of selling the Volvo brand while simultaneously expanding their China product portfolio.


Perhaps the most impressive example of this trend is seen with Volkswagen AG. Historically the market share leader in China, the world's third largest automaker recently announced that it sold a record 652,222 vehicles in China and Hong Kong in the first half of 2009, up 22.7% year on year. For Volkswagen, this makes China its biggest auto market worldwide for the first time. VW has achieved these results by bringing their most advanced vehicle and powertrain technology to the China mark, having recently launched their 1.4 - 2.0L TSI engine family. With additional plans to introduce their DSG gearbox, VW is poised to take full advantage of the growth in sales of compact cars. VW will continue to bolster their strength in the market this year, with plans to introduce the all-new Volkswagen Golf, along with plans to start manufacturing two new SUV models in its plants in eastern Nanjing and western Chengdu. In May, Volkswagen formed a partnership with China's BYD Co. to jointly develop hybrid and electric vehicles powered by lithium-ion batteries, becoming BYD's first industrial partner.


Clearly, the global center of gravity of automotive strength has shifted east. Those manufacturers who have anticipated this trend and are providing market-relevant products will continue to reap the benefits as the China market continues its inexorable expansion.


In the next posting in this series, I will describe the trend towards "Acquisition of Foreign Assets and Key Development Competencies by Chinese Companies".


Click here to read this article on GLG News
Click here to view article published in Gasgoo.com China Automotive News


Cash-for-clunkers program keeps rolling

Xinhua News Services, August 7, 2009

www.chinaview.cn 2009-08-07 16:05:31

by Jing Zhao Cesarone

CHICAGO, Aug. 6 (Xinhua) -- As a huge hit with consumers and generating about 250,000 incremental sales, the "cash-for-clunkers" incentive program received a new boost of 2 billion U.S. dollars on Thursday night after the U.S. Senate voted 60 to 37 to approve the measure.

Last week the federal government nearly suspended the cash-for-clunkers program because consumers had burned through the budgeted 1 billion dollars in only four days.

Administration officials said that the extension will subsidize the sale of another 500,000 new vehicles. Consumers can get a rebate of up to 4,500 dollars if they trade in gas guzzlers for fuel-efficient vehicles at least through Labor Day in early September.

The White House also supports the extension of the popular program. President Barack Obama has already said he will sign it.

According to government and industry officials, the consumer response had been overwhelming since dealers began offering "clunker" rebates in July.

Across the country, auto dealers have reported a greater rush to stores and rapidly growing sales numbers.

Bill Russo, president and founder of Synergistics Limited, has over 15 years' experience as an automotive executive. "The initial one billion U.S. dollars invested in the program generated approximately 250,000 incremental sales, or an increase of about 20 percent from the normal selling rate. The seasonally-adjusted sales rate was over 11 million units in July, the best performance this year," he told Xinhua in an exclusive interview.

"Companies like Ford and Hyundai saw year-over-year sales increases for July. Others saw improvements over prior-month selling rates," Russo added.

According to U.S. officials, sales under the cash-for-clunkers program have hit 180,000 vehicles so far. The star seller of the "clunker" program was Toyota's Corolla Sedan, which surpassed the Ford Focus as the best-selling vehicle. The Honda Civic came in third.

Under this program, the new vehicles sold average 25.3 mpg, while those traded in only got 18.5 mpg.

Talking about other benefits, Russo pointed out that the program was encouraging American consumers to trade in their cars for smaller, more fuel efficient ones.

"The consumer movement toward more fuel efficient cars may outlast the program, and this will lower fuel consumption and provide environmental benefits," he said.

The majority of the U.S. Senate supports the program. U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow called the program "one of the most important and successful stimuli we have had. It has not only boosted auto sales but the overall economy as well."

However, other senators disagree and have asked for amendments to the program such as excluding richer consumers and increasing the amount of vouchers to help lower-income Americans purchase vehicles.

Arizona's Republican Senator John McCain, who led the charge against putting any more money into the program, blasted it as an unfair giveaway of taxpayer dollars.

He criticized the program for increasing debt in an unfair effort to subsidize the car industry over other small deserving businesses.

Despite the popularity and initial success of the cash-for-clunkers program, some experts have also voiced concerns.

Russo pointed out that the money allocated to the program will run out very quickly. He said although the cash-for-clunkers program has given the U.S. auto industry a much-needed boost, the sales increases might not last long after the program ends.

In addition, "dealers have complained that the program was very cumbersome and bureaucratic," Russo told Xinhua. "The process for determining (the) rebate level and applying for reimbursements from the government is very difficult. In comparison, China's method of lowering the consumption tax rate was very simple to implement."

Bob Confer, an opinion columnist for the Niagara Gazette, pointed out that cash-for-clunkers will create a temporary bubble very similar to the housing bubble, the bursting of which helped spawn the current economic recession.

Editor: Deng shasha
Click here to view original article posted at www.chinaview.cn

8.06.2009

Synergistics blog promoted on sourcing-asia website, targeting German top firms

Sourcing Asia Blog, August 2009

Click here to link to the Sourcing Asia Blog site

Repost:

SOURCING ASIA BLOGGT...

Als Print-Magazin erscheint sourcing asia - so zweimonatlich wie nur irgendwie möglich. Online sind wir schneller: Blog, Twitter, News, Videos, schlaue Blogs und mehr. Die "fort" laufenden Neuigkeiten halten wir mit den Links im Blog für Sie fest. Genauso wie unsere - oder auch Ihre - Anmerkungen

Abonnieren Posts (Atom)

BILL RUSSO ANALYSIERT...

Bill Russo analysiert...
...die Autowirtschaft in China und global. Der Ex-Chrysler-Mann hält Vorträge und twittert als billrusso ohne Ende. Seine Beratungsfirma heißt Synergistics.

FONS TUINSTRA BEOBACHTET...

Fons Tuinstra beobachtet...
Unser Buchautor Fons Tuinstra, der auch für den China Herald schreibt, sah 2005 die Westler in China vom Veränderungswillen der Chinesen manchmal restlos überfordert. Von Belgien aus versucht Tuinstra via Twitter (fonstuinstra) mit China Schritt zu halten.

ES KOMMENTIERT...

Hier ein Blick in einige der interessantesten Blogs und Websites zum Asiengeschäft.

UND ER?

HANS GÄNG
Herausgeber, Gründer, Chefredakteur, CEO von local global
MEIN PROFIL VOLLSTÄNDIG ANZEIGEN

..TWITTERT AUCH.